Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 944 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $39.9 vs $298.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-8700T - $0.25 vs $1.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 191 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for $298.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |