Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6200 is 176 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 16% better in League of Legends than Celeron G540 - 52 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 55% cheaper than FX-6200 - $19.25 vs $42.85
- Up to 48% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-6200 - $0.43 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10674 minutes ago
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |