Buy on Amazon
$19.25
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $19.25 vs $75.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-7400T - $0.08 vs $0.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G540 - 254 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
232
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G540 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.5 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Core i5 Quad-core i5-7400T 2.4GHz Server Processor
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
