Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 70% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $19.25 vs $63.92
- Up to 71% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Celeron G3930 - $0.04 vs $0.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G540 - 456 vs 448 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 51 vs 65 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
448
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |