Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-7350K - $19.25 vs $40.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-7350K - $0.1 vs $0.2 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G540 - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Buy for $40 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |