Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-6200 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 60 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-7350K - $42.85 vs $51.6
- Up to 15% better value when playing Control than Core i3-7350K - $0.22 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 6 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4171 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |