Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $48.02 vs $419.95
- Up to 68% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-13900F - $0.51 vs $1.6 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 180% better in FIFA 23 than FX-4300 - 263 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 32 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
94
35.741444866920155%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
31.874999999999996%
Price, $
$419.95
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |