Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4866 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 39% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-750 - 208 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $60.0 vs $419.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900F - $0.4 vs $2.02 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
19.801980198019802%
Price, $
$419.95
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
150
72.11538461538461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |