Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3240 - 195 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $41.0 vs $435.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76990 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76991 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
20.293040293040292%
Multi-Core
1137
6.6031709158487715%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |