Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 163% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1620 - 184 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $49.0 vs $419.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
14.981684981684982%
Multi-Core
723
4.198850107439457%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |