Buy on Amazon
$485.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2548 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G1620 - 221 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $485.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
24.002347417840376%
Multi-Core
723
6.759536275243081%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
