Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $49.0 vs $459.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $0.45 vs $2.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 75% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G1620 - 192 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
110
57.291666666666664%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
18.828451882845187%
Price, $
$459
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
15.042294961382863%
Multi-Core
723
4.7653572370155555%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |