Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $49.0 vs $380.09
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 59% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1620 - 167 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Buy for $380.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
13.75252185608608%
Multi-Core
723
3.588445503275759%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |