Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1697 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $49.0 vs $299.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1620 - 220 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
41.5650406504065%
Multi-Core
723
25.511644318983766%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |