Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1113
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1113
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1295 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 86% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $49.0 vs $352.36
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1620 - 114 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Intel Xeon E5-1660 V4 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3OEM Pack
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.86786018755328%
Multi-Core
723
10.749330954504906%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
