Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1112 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $352.36 vs $370.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 24 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $352.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Buy for $370 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1173
69.28529238038983%
Multi-Core
6726
67.67961360434695%
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |