Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4745 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-530 - 246 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $45.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900F - $0.21 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 73 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |