Buy on Amazon
$45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $113
Availability
MSRP in USD: $113
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 2794 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - $45.0 vs $347.48
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-7960X - $0.36 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 73 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 41% better in War Thunder than Core i3-530 - 178 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 32 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel Core i3-530 Processor 2.93 GHz 4 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-7960X X-Series Processor 16 Cores up to 4.2 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $347.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i3-530
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-7960X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
