Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2662 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 6% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon W3680 - 131 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 64 vs 12 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | EPYC |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
