Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500U is 3218 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon W3680 - 151 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 5 3500U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
