Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon W3680 - 117 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 20 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
