Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5600U outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5600U is 1811 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5600U - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5600U
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon W3680 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-5600U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-5600U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
