Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon W3680 - 197 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 24 vs 12 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
