Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 3310 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 31% better in Diablo IV than Xeon W3680 - 136 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
