Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702MQ outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702MQ is 1168 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3680 - 220 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 37 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
