Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1037 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $56.99 vs $78.02
- Up to 29% better value when playing Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.47 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1911 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1911 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |