Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 1410 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 276 vs 269 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $93.38 vs $136.62
- Up to 33% better value when playing F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.34 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |