Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 197 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $135.0 vs $232.12
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 91 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77128 minutes ago
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
72.19641672196417%
Multi-Core
3898
92.23852342640795%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |