Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1905 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1280 - 158 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |