Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2929 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium P6100 - 105 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 24 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |