Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 758 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Pentium P6100 - 235 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |