Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3725 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8350 - 380 vs 319 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than FX-8350 - $138.98 vs $185.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-8350 - $0.37 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
380
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |