Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8350 - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than FX-8350 - $138.95 vs $188.02
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $188.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74628 minutes ago
Buy for $138.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |