Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2171 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 57% better in FIFA 23 than FX-8350 - 151 vs 96 FPS
- Up to 32% better value when playing FIFA 23 than FX-8350 - $1.31 vs $1.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 6% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $185.0 vs $197.65
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3346 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Colfax | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |