Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $185.0 vs $235.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700K - $1.28 vs $1.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8350 - 168 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
91%
Price, $
$235.99
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |