Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 285 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $42.85 vs $270.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-11900 - $0.17 vs $0.95 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2738 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2738 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |