Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 17% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G550 - 179 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $49.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-11900 - $0.32 vs $1.51 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3286 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |