Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2412 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $19.59 vs $295.0
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G550 - 219 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
22.767593140153757%
Multi-Core
629
7.810753756364088%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |