Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3048 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $180.0 vs $197.65
- Up to 5% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.81 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-875K - 233 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15322 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
95%
Price, $
$197.65
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |