Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $180.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-11900F - $0.78 vs $0.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-875K - 252 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9378 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |