Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3943 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-875K - 287 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $179.99 vs $180.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-875K - $0.63 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |