Buy on Amazon
$180
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4971 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $180.0 vs $229.99
- Up to 3% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14400 - $1.07 vs $1.1 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-875K - 210 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i7-875K Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-14400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i5-14400
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
