Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 941 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1610 - 246 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $37.0 vs $67.64
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $67.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74941 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74939 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |