Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 794 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6200 - 127 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - $42.85 vs $51.43
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4690 - $0.38 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $51.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14355 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |