Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 488 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3900 - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - $39.9 vs $51.43
- Up to 17% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-4690 - $0.24 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $51.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2453 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |