Buy on Amazon
$55.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 461 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-6200 - 202 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $42.85 vs $55.26
- Up to 11% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i5-4670S - $0.24 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 6 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I5-4670S I5 4670S 3.1 GHz Used Quad-Core CPU Processor 6M 65W LGA 1150
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18419 minutes ago
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18418 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
