Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 11% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8120 - 109 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $39.99 vs $55.26
- Up to 20% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-4670S - $0.41 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12457 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |