Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 804 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-6200 - 108 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-4460 - $42.85 vs $64.04
- Up to 25% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-4460 - $0.44 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 6 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18400 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |