Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3599 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 36% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6200 - 121 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $42.85 vs $161.76
- Up to 64% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400 - $0.48 vs $1.34 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9749 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9749 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |