Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100T outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100T is 803 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 186 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $99.0 vs $232.12
- Up to 59% better value when playing Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.53 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4856 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
181
97.31182795698925%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
41.40625%
Price, $
$232.12
42%
Buy for $232.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4854 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |